Atlas Fest Beer with Dad

November 10, 2022

It’s fall, it’s the end of October, and I don’t know when Octoerfest actually is, but it must be around October somewhere, right?  (Turns out it ends the first Sunday in October.) So, I thought I’d remember my dad with a German Octoberfest beer. I found the Atlas Festbier at my local store and brought home a six pack to try as the Beer of the Month™ beer with my dad.

(https://www.brewbound.com/beerevents/2022/festbier-release-at-atlas-brew-works-half-street-brewery-tap-room)

My dad’s side of the family is German. Very German. My grandfather didn’t speak English until he went to elementary school. He lived in a tiny German Mennonite village in Minnesota where nearly everyone spoke German. My relatives there still pronounce our last name with a V instead of a W (LAY-ven). In fact, when my grandfather was about 3, an itinerant peddler showed up at the family homestead and asked, “Bist du Löwen?” (“Are you a Loewen?”) My grandfather heard “Bist du leben?” That means, “Are you living?” and he understood it as a threat and ran screaming. Throughout his adult life, that was how he and his sister Aganetha greeted each other on the phone. Another bona fide? I had my own lederhosen as a child. 

(Photo not of the author as a young man, by Holly Vegter https://www.shutterstock.com/image-photo/young-toddler-boy-dressed-oktoberfest-lederhosen-750281701)

The Festbier pours out nice and golden. It really just looks like a nice drinkable beer. The can says there are orangeblossom notes, but I really believe, without any self-effacement, that I have a pretty trash palate, and I don’t taste it. I DID jot down there’s a little bitterness at the end, and one review mentioned mid-palate bitterness, so I am impressed with my own self. It also mentions breadiness, and I don’t get what that means at all. What I do find is it’s a nice, easy drinking, but tasty beer. 

When I was growing up in the early 70s, my dad preferred Schlitz which, I gather, in the 60s was actually not a bad mass-produced beer? However, the 70s apparently destroyed the brand. My memories of it are fond, although I never tasted it. I just remember my dad tearing off the tab and dropping it in the can, deeply impressing me with his risky behavior. I have stories he told me about taste tests (he LOVED taste tests) that Schlitz won among his friends and him, proving that their scorn for Schlitz was not based in the actual taste. 

All of that is to say that my dad liked easy drinking lager and I think my dad would very much have liked this beer. It’s a really nice and easy to drink beer with a little sweetness; I don’t get the citrus notes mentioned in the things I read, but I bet this would be great at a fall cookout with some wurst, some pretzels, and a nice pair of lederhosen.

Beers with Dad

June 3, 2022

I’m sitting on my patio under the pergola as this somewhat unusually hot June day winds to a close. A male robin who built a home just above where I’m sitting is flitting about the yard, flicking his tail, his beak full, waiting to get to the wife? Eggs? Hatchlings? He lands on the lawn mower handle sitting in the back yard and eyes me. The trumpet vine bearding the pergola has grown thick enough so that I have no idea who or what is in his nest. But father is worried about me sitting still here. And now, finally, I just heard the chirr of his wings as he landed above me, finally able to deliver whatever it is he has. 

It’s the beginning of June; for teachers, it’s the end of December. We’re coming up on New Year’s Eve. It’s time to push through to the end, take stock and reflect on how to be better, and to make resolutions for the upcoming year,. So, I’m going to combine that lovely anticipation of the new with some reflecting on the past. For my dad’s last birthday in February of 2021 (and it was to be his last birthday), I gave him a beer of the month club. I’d go buy some highly regarded 6 pack, bring it to his house, and he and I and often his wife Susan would taste, discuss what we noticed, and compare our amateur notes to the reviews I’d printed out. In an effort to reflect on my relationship with my father, to remember him, and to purposefully think of him, I’m going to continue trying beers with him in mind at the beginning of each month. I was really happy to come up with this idea of a gift for my dad. He could buy anything he really needed or wanted, so experiential gifts like this were perfect for him. Plus, in all the years I’ve known him, he loved taste tests. Even at his memorial, he instructed us to have an ice cream taste test, and he suggested certain flavors, if we were so inclined.

This June, the beer is River Runner Extra Special Bitter by the James River Brewery of Scottsville, VA. The main reason I chose this beer is the name. My dad was an avid canoist, and he especially loved paddling rivers. He came of age as a Boy Scout at Canoe Base in northern Wisconsin. He often told us stories of trips, adventures, portaging, and his friends there. As I grew up, he took us on many canoeing trips, rafting trips, inner tubing trips. I remember as a toddler, I had my own pint-sized canoe paddle. He even published a book about how important canoeing and rivers were to him. So,the name of the beer is apt. As well, he didn’t like thick, dark beers much, and I don’t like Pale Ales, so I thought this could be a good one.

It sure looks pretty,though, doesn’t it? A lovely deep gold, a nice little foam on top. The can says the beer is a British-style pale Ale with ultra-mild hops and bold malts. I can say that it’s not hoppy, so I like it. It’s got a little sweetness and a little sourness in it, toio, but it’s very pleasant. I give it an 8 out of 10. I think my dad would like it, too. When I was a child, my dad’s favorite beer was Schlitz; he’d pull the pop top off, slide it into the can, and enjoy his beer. He told me of a taste test he’d done when he lived in Mississippi in the 70’s which Schlitz had won once folks didn’t realise the lower class beer they were preferring. This beer is better than the most recent version of Schlitz. It has a bit more flavor than what I’d consider a summer drinker–a light pilsner to drink on a hot day– but this just means it’d go great with a half smoke or something a little spicy. It’s quite good.

Baduizm

March 29, 2022

I bought this album when I had just moved back from living in West Africa in 1997 when the album dropped. My college friend Matt was working for a record distributing company, and I, a record collector too long without access to records, could buy albums from him at cost. I went a little crazy. 

I don’t know why I chose this album–I don’t remember reading about it or hearing about it from anyone. But somehow I chose it. The album starts of with “Rimshot–Intro”, a little jazzy song that clocks in at less than two minutes. Apparently, before recording the album, she’d become fascinated with the “boom-bap” sound we loved in 80’s East Coast hip hop, and this is the track that she came up with to pay homage to that sound. There’s some Ron Carter/Tribe vibe going on, there’s her lovely lilting voice, and some hip 90s kind of scat singing in the soul/R & B tradition. 

The song ends and switches instantly into the track that I think I bought the album for, “On & On.” Badu here shows off her New Age, incense and sage, crystals and Afrocentrism character with lines like “Most intellects do not believe in God, but they fear us just the same.” There’re lots of little key words and allusions I don’t get, but I assume have some underlying philosophical meaning–”I was born underwater/With three dollars and six dimes/Yeah you might laugh/’Cause you did not do your math”; there’s some numerology going here (Maybe having to do with the 5 Percent kind?), but the beat is fully funky and the melody is entrancing. This was the jam I heard and wanted to own, I’m pretty sure. I’m listening to it now, and I had to stop typing to bob my head, sway, and dance a little on the stool I’m sitting on.

The next song picks up the tempo, gets your head nodding a little faster, a little harder, and her southern drawl comes out a bit more. She calls back to her cipher from “On & On”, and the lessons on how to be a righteous person flow fast in her sultry voice–

I don’t walk around trying to be what I’m not

I don’t waste my time trying to get what you got

I work at pleasin’ me

Cause I can’t please you and that’s why I do what I do

My soul flies free like a willow tree

Doo wee doo wee doo wee

I can practically smell the incense, see the naturals and dashikis, hold the crystals, and there’s probably a guy wearing a kufi somewhere around here, too. But it’s a jam, and the familiar beats of 80s and 90s hip hop are funky and make my head bop.

“Apple Tree” is a sassy song to a man who wants to get some of her juicy fruit. Or maybe the apple represents her knowledge and understanding. If he ain’t wit’ it, she ain’t wit’ it, either. Or maybe the apple represents clean living; knowing Badu, who apparently was a yoga teacher, who went vegan in ‘97, this is the mot apt translation. But she’s sexy, too, and her mother is the inspiration for the Outkast song “Sorry, Ms. Jackson.” So maybe all the interpretations work.

For me, the album slows down with “Otherside of the Game”, a slow jam that is not my style. But Badu picks up the pace with the next song.

According to Pitchfork, “Next Lifetime” is the transcendent moment of the album. Of course, this wouldn’t be an album of the time without a skit or some little acting breaks. But “Next Lifetime” cuts its little drama short and gets into a lush slow song with a fat bass line slinking around a synth zooming up and down the scales. Pitchfork picks a good adjective: woozy. She’s overcome with deire for another guy while she’s already with someone, she’s smitten, and she’s trying to keep a clear head.

Next up is a silly little free style jazz piece about picking afro and going to see Wu-Tang. It’s fine, but not anything to listen to besides the first time you hear it. 

In fact, for me, the album falls off a bit from here on. It becomes a bit jazzy and self-indulgent, and I’ve never been a big Quiet Storm type. “4 Leaf Clover” is a remake of an Atlantic Star song, but it doesn’t get my head moving like the first half of the album does. Since this is an LP for me, that’s fine. I’ll just keep side one playing and move on once the needle lifts up.

“Sometimes” the penultimate song if you don’t count the return of “Rimshot (Outro)”, is more like the songs on the first side: a nice boom bap beat, a little bit of a head nodder, a little more uptempo. But it doesn’t have the brilliant mix of RnB and hip hop that the first side did, it doesn’t have that otherworldly funky strange sound that “On & On” has. It’s good, but it isn’t the song I want to hear from this album. 

As she goes out with “Certainly (Flipped It)”, Badu makes plenty of call backs to the best tracks on the album, both sonically and lyrically. There are some lines that come from other songs, there’s a nice beat, there’s a rising siren that leads into the chorus, and I can imagine this song being a nice one as your driving your car on a summer night with the windows down. Still, why wouldn’t I want to hear “On & On” instead? I wouldn’t, that’s right.

The B52s

March 22, 2022

I remember getting into The B52s in 9th grade or so, 1985. Perhaps an adult mentioned them to me? I can’t be sure. The album had come out in 1979, which seems amazing to me, remembering what 1979 music sounds like–Billy Joel, Donna Summers, Rod Stewart. The B52s don’t sound like any of this. But this was the first album of theirs I bought, and I liked the kooky, fun vibe of it, the retro look and sound, and the kitschy feel of the whole package. Listening to it now is fun. Researching it, I find the album was produced by Chris Blackwell, which just makes me admire him the more.

the_b-52s_cover

“Planet Claire”: The song begins with a 1950s space movie sound that goes on for a remarkable 2:30 without any vocals. Just strange ray gun-type synths and the driving bass and drum lines. Fred Schneider comes in with his campy voice and ridiculous vocals and simplistic lyrics, and they all fit together–the strange music, the fey voice and phrasing, and the story of the otherworldly being from Planet Claire.

“52 Girls”: Another song with that fierce driving beat. This album is eminently danceable so far. Having them playing a house party seems like it would have been the best party of all time. It’s in this song that the women of the band move forward and Fred drops out of sight. Tight harmonies, that staccato drum, and the 50s guitar, almost surf rock, drive the song, or more fairly, propel the song along.

The third song on the album, “Dance This Mess Around”, features Cindy Wilson with a very punky vocal style, singing to a boy in a quite vulnerable way, especially in the first half of the song. The second half of the song, which is a listing of various fictional dances, is goofier and Fred Schneider’s vocals don’t lessen that goofiness. This song is a bit slower than the previous two, and while I do like it, especially Wilson’s yearning and raw voice, it’s not nearly as funky and fun as the previous two. It would have slowed down that house party I was thinking of earlier.

The house party picks back up, though, with the iconic song of the album,”Rock Lobster.” Probably this is the track I was told to get the album for, back when you didn’t really buy singles very much, and I would buy an album just to get one song. This song clocks in at a beefy 6:49, which for a punk, new wave song, is an eternity. I mean, the whole album is 9 songs and 39 minutes! This is a DANCING song. You couldn’t keep folks off the floor, I bet, when this came on brand new. I can imagine summer party goers in Athens in the late 70s just losing their communal shit when this came on at the club/frat party/house party. Or if you were at some place like the 9:30 club, especially the 9:30 club of the 80s, and this band was playing? MY GAWD. The walls would be dripping with sweat.

slam-dancing(Discharge in 1983 at the old 9:30 Club. Photo by Jim Saah.)

badbrains_ratmusic(Photo of Bad Brains at the old 9:30 Club from http://youthcrimes.blogspot.com/.)

You can see what the place looked like. There’s a damn pillar in the middle of the place, and you basically could walk on people to get to the stage.

There’s nothing bad to be said about “Rock Lobster.” It is one of the best rock songs of all time. 

The album, though, takes a little bit of a downturn for me from here. “Lava” is a fine song, but of course, anything that follows “Rock Lobster” is going to suffer from being in such proximity to the classic. “There’s a Moon in the Sky (Called the Moon)” is my least favorite song on the album. It has all the great characteristics of a B52 song: driving riffs on the guitar, staccato drumming, illy lyrics, tight harmonies from the women, crazy singing by Fred Schneider. But it just isn’t as charismatic as the other songs.

By the time “Hero Worship” comes on, I’m not even sure what this song is. But as soon as Cindy Wilson begins singing, I remember. This song is a straight ahead rock song with Wilson growling and strutting through the song. This song doesn’t have the surfer, strange vibe of the rest of the songs, and following it is a strange song, “6060-842.” Schneider sounds super campy, Kate Pierson and Cindy Wilson are harmonizing, the synths are really kicking in, and who knows what the hell the song is really about: a phone number on the bathroom wall?

Finally, perhaps in a bid to be even weirder, the album ends with a strange cover of “Downtown.” Wilson sings in a quasi-Cockney accent, Schneider and Pierson echo her in harmony, and the song winds its way down with voices fading out.

A new Beginning

March 1, 2022

Processed with Snapseed.

My record collection.

In an effort, at my ripe old age, to engage more with my day to day life, to be creative, to make things, and to declutter, I am resurrecting (a good verb) this blog to examine a treasure from my past and to examine its relevance to my life now. I am speaking, of course, of my record collection, sitting off to the side of my life in the family room, going unlistened to for years now, what with the advent of the internet, YouTube, Spotify, iTunes, Pandora, and on and on into the narcissistic echo of immediate gratification. When did portability of music trump sound of music? I know it’s grandpa behavior to say, “When I was a kid”, and of course, it’s not even correct in this situation. When I was in high school, I listened to punk music on my cassette tapes (TDK 90 was my preferred choice) on a walkman the size of an open hand. If I turned it over too quickly in my hand while playing, there was a noticeable wobble in the song I was listening to. So, I can’t honestly take the position of a purist or audiophile. But I’ll try to, anyway.

I am struck by people I see with tiny music players and huge headphones. It’s Rubenesque and anti-Rubenesque at the same moment, size indicating class, trapped in the same person. The mp3 player must be tiny, and the headphones must be big and status is conferred due to those opposing qualities.

251245001_7c6c7362a7_o

(Photo by jim212jim, https://www.flickr.com/photos/syobosyobo/)

Do these people ever listen to quality equipment? Have they ever heard the warm sound of vinyl? I once dated a younger woman who was astonished to learn what “phono” meant on a stereo receiver. I am sure that most people under 25 now don’t know what a stereo receiver even is.

In any case, I am going to start listening to my albums and responding to them here, waxing nostalgic, remembering where I bought this one, how I got this one, wondering why this one is still around, and deciding whether or not to keep any of them. I’ll be going alphabetically, just going across the top row of the shelves, and then the bottom row, and we’ll see what kind of things I find!

Donald Hall–“To Build a House”

February 22, 2022

The third and last section of The One Day (I don’t understand the title yet–it repeatedly shows up in this section and I don’t know what it’s really doing) is called “To Build a House.” It returns a bit to the Biblical tone that the first section has and it sounds like Whitman, too. “I praise old lilacs rising in woods besides cellarholes;/I praise toads.” The love for and the meaning in basic everyday things shine in this section. And the love continues through the section, just a love of living. He loves even the death of a friend, “cold on a staircase.” He tells us that living is the thing, and that death is a part of living; so, we have to love that, too, and understand it’s living when we die. That’s a hard one emotionally. It’s easy, mentally. It’s a nice trick as a philosophical rumination. But knowing Hall has gone through his own battle with cancer here and that his wife is nearing the sudden end of her life makes it clearer that he believes this idea of life and death being equally beautiful and terrible, too. 

And then Hall begins with the “one day” motif that appears often in this section. The first stanza ends with “The one day stands unmoving in sun and shadow.” (That line shows up again, verbatim, about halfway through the section.) Soon, he writes, “From the first orchard to the last is one day and eternity.” I read an interview somewhere where Hall said he wanted to erase centuries; here he is trying it. Adam and Eve are the same as Phyllis and Marc from the second section, I guess. We are all the same despite the passage of time and space. I do believe that, I think, though it’s hard to prove or disprove as a truth. So, the one day is symbolic of all days, is maybe a synecdoche–one day is time? And time is a life? Our lives are a cell, a day, a single instance and yet so long and complex and beautiful. I think this is what Hall means. And what he thinks makes life beautiful is simple living with people.

In Hall’s estimation, simple living with people is not only important, but it’s morally better. There are several stanzas in this section about how to make money: buy land, subdivide it, build cookie cutter houses, “vote for statutes that outlaw visible poverty.” Or one could go the Mitt Romney route–”Find an old corporation/self-insured, with capital reserves…dehire managers, yellowslip maintenance…Get out, sell stock for capital gains, reward the usurer,/and look for new plunder.” Interesting choice there, “the usurer.” Makes me think of Christ and the money changers in the temple. Or you could do what Hall and Kenyon did. Buy an orchard, topsoil the trees, take care of them against bear and deer, learn how the seasons work with fruit and live connected to the wind and the rain. I like this idea; it’s so romantic to me, but I fear that I am not hardy enough to do it.

The house that Hall lived in, and that the narrator lives in, has two chimneys: one is at the narrator’s end of the house, and the other at the wife’s wing. I assume they therefore represent the two and their roles in the marriage. They function to warm both and self, they are sustained by both, they comfort both. It’s a motif, too, and since in the quote my father liked there is mention of two chimneys, it’s an image I wanted to think a little more about to better understand. And by being together in the house, though isolated at their own end of the house, “the day is double/in the work, love, and solitude of eyes/that gaze not at each other but at a third thing:/a child, a ciderpress, a book–work’s paradise.” So, like a chimney, they function for another, they maintain each other, and it’s a simple gift that has to be taken care of to be keep alive. It’s work to split wood, to haul it, to stoke a fire.

Hall believes in work. “The days you work,” said O’Keefe, “are the best days.” “Work is paradise.” “To work is to live without dying.” I do like how artists talk about “the work.” “Just do the work,” a photographer friend tells me. “You just gotta do the work!” the comic exhorts another on the podcast entitled “Working It Out.” Creating as work, but the way they say it, it’s more. Teachers don’t tell each other to just do the work. It’s a different work for artists; it’s capitalized and holds within it a responsibility to an ethos–Work is being true to self and tradition, to doing something the right way because it takes time and effort and thought. That’s what Hall tells us, and Frost in “After Apple Picking”–the work is the reward. “A job well-done is its own reward.” You hear that as a kid, and you think it’s just a platitude to get you to do more work, but really, I think it’s true. Shortcuts are rarely worth it in good work. Yet I don’t like work. And I do. I can start. But it’s hard to finish.

And four stanzas from the end of the poem come the lines my father quoted. And a little more: “We are one cell perpetually/dying and being born, led by a single day that presides/over our passage through the thirty thousand days/from highchair past work and love to suffering death./We plant; we store the seedcorn. Our sons and daughters/topdress old trees. Two chimneys require:/Work, love, build a house, and die. But build a house.” We are one cell perpetually–I like that, the universe within us, the immortality, nearly. And the one day presiding over all the other days–the day never ends, though it sees the other days. They are all there in our lives. The cycles from earlier in the poem of harvest and storage and planting and caring. And the house with a bed and people, hearths and two chimneys. And Work. It does seem fulfilling to me, somehow. 

The last annotations I made were, of course, in the last stanza. “It is always this time; the time that we live by/is this time.” The present tense and the word “always” give this sentence a grandeur of certainty about how permanent and absolute living is, how important the Earth is. The sun, the creek, the toad, me: we are one cell, in one house–”the bed is a world of pain.”

I like this section a lot more than the others. And it’s that Whitmanesque love of nature, simplicity, and humanity that draws me in. Like with Whitman, I think I can’t live it, or at least not as honestly as he and Hall did, but it’s a good model, and it’s a good way to reflect upon what’s important. So, in the end, I don’t think I’ll read much of this book again except for the last section; that’s the one with the images that move me the most, that speak the most, and that seem less intellectual and conceptual to me, and thus are more direct and interesting.

Four Classic Texts

January 25, 2022

The second section of the poem The One Day is called “Four Classic Texts.” Hall uses different sources to inform his four sections within the poem–”Prophecy”, “Pastoral”, “History”, and “Eclogue.” In an interview, Hall said that he wrote the poem over a period of years, finding different aspects and references to help him shape the final form. I don’t really get the way this section fits into the whole, but perhaps that’s because I haven’t read all three sections. Hall did say that he wanted “to cancel out the centuries” and show that “(e)verything happens at once.” I can see those efforts as he poses distant things shoulder to shoulder. But I don’t understand how it all fits into the books as a whole.

“Prophecy” has an Old Testament flavor to it in content and in style. Hall uses Biblical language and enumerations of seemingly sinful behaviors as well as references to names such as Elzina, Jehovah, and Abraham to color this section with the idea that an angry God sees our modern lives as lacking morality and we as seduced by its trappings. There are references to a “prophesy through millennia” as well as a line about “Babylon’s managers” who “burn in the rage of the Lamb.” The tone of anger within the incongruous pairings of suburban culture and Old Testament language lend an epic mundanity to our American lives. The first person narrator rejects thing after thing: “leaded panes”, “five and dimes”, “Japanese smoked oysters”,”the corner of the atrium/where Phyllis or Phoebe speaks with Billy or Marc/who says that afternoons are best although not reliable.” So, the epic flavor is nearly satirized by the boring subject matter.

The second section, “Pastoral”, reminds me of “The Passionate Shepherd to His Love” by Christopher Marlowe and its subsequent responses (Like Raleigh’s “The Nymph’s Reply to the Shepherd”) with its characters’ voices and alternating conversation. Hall has the “shepherd” role filled by the aforementioned Marc and the nymph is, of course, Phyllis. They alternate stanzas, although some of the stanzas enjamb while the voices switch and thus the characters complete each other’s sentences. Hall brings back his central metaphor, “The world is a bed”, and the section, as it progresses, moves from an ancient pastoral poem to one of modernity. Hall references brokers and airplanes and putters, bringing back the suburbs and middle class life as Marc criticizes himself and Phyllis for their inability to do things people have done for centuries–plant food, make clothes, live. With this shift and the contrast of station wagons here and dryads there, it feels like Hall is continuing his criticism of shallow modern American life and our lack of connection with the world, with each other and with our past and its culture. It makes me think of another mid-20th century Connecticut poet, Wallace Stevens, for some reason. The section ends with Marc “finding distraction in Rodeo Drive, in/duplicate bridge, in gladiators, and in my pastoral song.” Hall mixes the cultures up, valuing the old and mocking the superficiality of the new. 

“History” is rife with allusions, many of which I don’t know much about. There’re, for example, Roman-sounding names like Juvenis and Senex. All I could really find about Juvenis is that it means a young person. And Senex is a stock character, an old man, from Plautus texts. This sets a series of military references and stockbrokers and manhattans and Japanese sedans. The pattern of modernity mocked for its softness and contrasted with the past steeped in tradition and skills continues in this section. Some of the passages I found very touching in their simple descriptions of people close to their earth and its behaviors. Boys wait for the birds to lay their eggs before harvesting them; oaks are cut for beams; acorns are left from those oaks for the pigs. What the pigs don’t eat become oaks again, and again they will become beams and food. My father often wondered at how modern people knew so little about their world. I have no idea, though he mentioned it to me more than once, if the moon comes up earlier each day or later. Thus we lose ourselves and our place, I think Hall is saying. 

This section, filled with references to the World Wars, to Roman conquests, to European assassinations, to battles and places innumerable that I have never heard of, is aptly named “History”, but at this point of the poem, I don’t really understand what Hall is doing. Sure, I see some themes, and I see some repeated phrases and allusions. But how do these sections work together? 

The last section, “Eclogue”, apparently crystallized for Hall when he borrowed Virgil’s eclogue Bucolica. I know nothing about Virgil beyond his prominence. So, this fact doesn’t do much for me. I did learn that an Eclogue is a poem where shepherds talk to each other. This section seems more hopeful to me with its imagery of growth and fruit, of beautiful settings and its dismissal of the history that the previous sections ruminated on so much. Instead of battles and emperors, there are words of praise for simple things like pine cones and acorns. “When the great year turns, the months/will lose their number, each hour outlast a season,/spring and summer upthrust from new earth ten million/poppies.” This admiring and reverential tone continues throughout the section as Hall praises the seasons, the cycles, and the subsequent life that pours from the earth. It’s a reassuring section after the uninspiring view of modern man in the preceding parts. Time becomes a smooth path as “Homer’s agile fingers/draw the bow and by his hexameters Grant besieges/Vicksburg again.” (Go, Grant!) The proximity of past and ancient past and present are beautiful as I read this and I think about how much we are the same no matter where or when we are. I just realized an important echo here. The first section ended with a fiery Lamb, but this section, with its love of life, ends with “then will we study the lamb careless in the millet”, and that image encapsulates the differences in the other sections. They look at man as violent, God as retributive, Hall lists violence and fear. But this section, spoken by the shepherd attuned to their surroundings, is filled with love for the world and the things within it.

Donald Hall–The One Day

January 17, 2022

A few years ago, my father emailed me the obituary of Donald Hall. He asked if I knew him, and wrote, “He is new to me but I like him.” After my dad died, I bought a copy of The One Day which won the National Book Critics Circle Award in poetry when it was published. It contained a snippet my dad quoted: “Work, love, build a house, and die. But build a house.” I thought I should get to know this man’s poetry a little better. 

I’ve now read only the first section of the book, “Shrubs Burnt Away”, but I don’t want to rush through it, and I’m also finding lots of things to think about with it, so I’m going to approach the book section by section.

“Shrubs Burnt Away” has two epigraphs: the first is from Matthew Arnold, the British poet perhap most famous for his poem about Dover Beach. Hall uses this snippet:

What then are the situations, from the representation of which, though accurate, no poetical enjoyment can be derived? They are those in which the suffering finds no vent in action; in which a continuous state of mental distress is prolonged, unrelieved by incident, hope, or resistance; in which there is everything to be endured, nothing to be done. 

The second epigraph is from a Chinese poet, Hsu Hsia-k’o. He writes, “Mi-t’o Temple after thirty li. A most desolate spot…For fear of them hiding tigers, all trees and shrubs have been burnt.”

And there is where Hall gets his title. Reflecting on these two quotations, I think there is an idea of relief from suffering and the necessity of suffering in creating beauty. Creating mitigates suffering. Arnold seems to tell us that poetry is what relieves us of pain; it functions to end distress through expression. “Poetical enjoyment” is achieved through venting, through relief, through hope, through doing. But the anecdote about the temple instructs us that destroying the bushes and trees to protect from tigers has reduced a beautiful spot to a desolate one. Removing the tigers through destroying the natural beauty of the place was a mistake, says Hsu and Hall. So, as I go into this section of the poem, I have those two precepts in mind.

The poem seems rather autobiographical; this inference could be the trick of having a first person narrator, but some of the details throughout the poem are from Hall’s life. On page 4, the narrator’s father, weeping and impotent, cries that his son will “do what he wants to do”, a direct legend from Hall’s own life. However, Halls’ father worked at a dairy, and the narrator’s works at a lumberyard. Small differences, but it means we can’t say the narrator is Hall.

The poem focusses on the narrator, a man, reflecting on his life–he reminisces about moments from his childhood, adulthood, and the present as he ages into n middle aged man. There is also the voice of the narrator’s mother (her stanzas are written in italics and from her point of view), and thus we learn the stories of the narrator’s father and of the various grandparents. The structure of the poem is rather consistent. Each stanza has 10 lines of free verse, and they often shift from the narrator at different points in his life to the narrator’s mother at different points in her life. Both characters are artists: the mother is a painter, an alcoholic who suffers from breakdowns and divorces (also unlike Hall’s mother, disrupting the autobiographical aspects of the poem). The narrator is a poet who leaves his pastoral childhood at some point to wander the gritty Los Angeles of the 60s or 70s, suffering from drink and malaise before, as Hall did, returning to a rural farmhouse to live. He wanders while “(i)t rains on Sunset Boulevard. I walk with the collar/of my jacket turned up. Topless go-go dancers twist/at the back of the bar.” It’s a shock from the early scenes of domesticity of the young boy calling for his mother from his bed. And then there’s a subsequent shock as the narrator is an older man in a farm house (Here, too, there are autobiographical notes as Hall retired from teaching to his familial farmhouse in New Hampshire where the poet Jane Kenyon lived with him until she died.) casting about for meaning and life in the empty rooms of the building. 

As I sit by myself, middle-aged in my yellow chair,

Staring at the vacant book of the ceiling, unfit

To work or love, aureoled with cigarette smoke

In the unstoried room, I daydream to build

The house of dying. (3)

So, the section explores these two people, three really with the father not exactly having his own say, as they try to find their ways through their lives. Hall uses several motifs to help express his overarching idea that without risk and suffering, life isn’t beautiful. The first is images of a house. We see it in the above quotation (which perhaps also carries an allusion to another of his works “The Painted Bed” as his chair is painted yellow). “A house of dying” is a coffin, but in this old farmhouse that many of his family members presumably have died in, he literally sits in a coffin of a sort. We know from Hamlet that “a grave-maker” makes “the houses that… last till doomsday” (V. i. 60-61). Later in the poem, Hall reverses the image and compares a house to a life: “At the exact millisecond when the two cells fused/and multiplied, I started this house.” He continues this idea through various descriptions of rooms and furniture, repeating the metaphor that “the world is a bed”, that he “built this house” and that he will “build it over again” while sitting in his chair (12). This idea that in living we build a house brings me back to the statement from Arnold that poetry is action against suffering, and essentially building a house, a shelter, is to take action against suffering–against cold, against rain, against darkness. So, I like it; I find it an apt metaphor and one that gives me some confidence and some purpose. My father built a literal house in Mississippi nearly singlehandedly when I was a toddler, and I am certain that he very much agreed with Hall in this symbolism of houses as larger metaphysical beings. 

But there’s another metaphor Hall repeats in this section–doomed airplanes–and their destruction seems to parallel artists and their families. Hall references Lindbergh, Earhart, Corrigan, Will Rogers, and even a man who built a plane in his garage using lawnmower engines, took off on it, and only some of his remains were found. To me, Hall is extolling the pursuit of something despite the risks; the beauty of taking risks, making something, and doing what one wants, echoing back to his father’s dictum of “He’ll do what he wants to do!” Perhaps that is what Hall illustrates with the character of the mother who had abandoned painting for a life as a mother and wife; the choice destroys her and destroys the beauty in her life. 

“Shrubs Burnt Away” ends with several more stanzas from the mother’s point of view than the son’s. The mother describes how, in her thirties, she was in love with fires that burned down white houses, and her life devolved into numbness. She divorced, ennui set in, and she slept a “drugged sleep.” She dreams of stumbling through a field of corpses–babies, old men, young women–dead bodies everywhere. And the poem ends with her voice recounting in the last two stanzas another dream of domesticity falling into surreal decay and violence. She feeds her weeping children prescription drugs and then an anonymous visitor enters the kitchen and proceeds to dismember a rag doll as a model of instruction for the mother. 

The poem ends with this metaphor of a family destroyed, perhaps. It ends with the mother’s domestic life in shards and pieces, maybe because she was not able to be the painter she wanted to be. Earlier in the poem, as a teen, she prepares a meal for her mother and is praised as a good future wife. Hall writes that she never painted again. It’s as if the domestic future she sees overwhelms the possibility of being an artist, of doing what she wants to do, and that destroys her. Meanwhile, the male narrator is happy in his terrible Bukowskian world of drugs and drink and women, feeding his body’s needs and desires. His last words are instructive: “Never do anything except what you want to do.”

The Brown Bunny

November 28, 2010

I enjoyed “Buffalo 66” when I saw it in the theater all those years ago.  I remember finding the lost characters strangely affecting and the style of the film complementary to that emotional impact.  Fast-forward to last week and “The Brown Bunny” was sitting on my desk, fresh from Netflix, waiting to be watched.  I’d heard about the controversy and Ebert’s evisceration of the Cannes screening of the film, but I also thought that the film could be one of those anti-commercial successes that critics dislike, but are worth watching.  When the movie ended, I thought I’d been wrong.  However, a few days later on, I am still thinking about the movie, which should be a good sign.  Somehow, Vincent Gallo convinces people, talented people, to work on his movies, so there should be something going on in them, somewhere.

Read the rest of this entry »

Photo apps

November 14, 2010

So, I have always been interested in photography, since high school.  My friend Chris and I would sometimes ditch school and go walking around DC taking pictures.  We would go out at night till all hours, shooting.  We’d spend hours in his basement darkroom, developing film and printing pictures.  I still am into it, but I don’t spend nearly as much time and effort as I want to or as necessary to get better and get better results.  Still, I do some.  And I have an iPhone, which makes it a bit easier to take quick shots.  Read the rest of this entry »